#Crysis 3 dx10 mod#

so there is a fair amount of dx10 hardware running dx9. This of course is complete nonsense, because even if users with dx9 hardware mostly didnвЂ™t have up to date cpus, dx10 is only available to vista users. while all crysis physics are cpu based, dx10 players are suspected to have better cpus installed - so dx10 servers run much better physics simulations (destructible environments, mainly). The reason dx9 gamers canвЂ™t play on dx10 servers is simply physics. they did the same with their 64bit version of farcry. Thats actually one of cryteks remarkable marketing tricks - to push technology of their investors. That there are some gameplay dynamics in DX10 that prohibit DX9 players from joining. People with DX9 versions of the game will not be able to join servers running the DX10 versions of the game. The only thing I read that Cervat Yerli said that struck me as odd, had to do with multiplayer. Interesting you mention benchmarks as I am betting Crysis will be an official DX10 staple for hardware sites. What exactly will with DX10 and Vista require? Cervat said they shot for wide scaleability - trick is if gamers are willing to water down the effects just to play. Increased effects on a DX9 in XP will punish anything but an uber specвЂ™d system.Д«oostAbuse - I didnвЂ™t play the MP beta, but everything IвЂ™ve read, it requires a high end system to get decent visuals/frame rates in DX9. DX10 hardware in Vista requires even more resources. With all that said - the Crysis engine takes some serious hardware regardless if youвЂ™re DX9 or DX10. By the time the full game is out, IвЂ™m sure there will be new methods to max effects on DX9 hardware.

#Crysis 3 dx10 mod#

doCHtor mentions the mod edit way to increase the effects for use for DX9 cards. Ringzero - I should clear up my point a bit. From the images I`d call the differences quite largeвЂ¦ your a hard man to please 8)